<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highly available filesytems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zomo.co.uk/2005/11/highly-available-filesytems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zomo.co.uk/2005/11/highly-available-filesytems/</link>
	<description>Is it done yet?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lemon</title>
		<link>http://www.zomo.co.uk/2005/11/highly-available-filesytems/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>lemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.zomo.co.uk/?p=13#comment-3</guid>
		<description>ZFS not a cluster fs, ack - just something it&#039;d like to check out for myself i guess. Cheers for the other pointers, I&#039;ll check them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZFS not a cluster fs, ack &#8211; just something it&#8217;d like to check out for myself i guess. Cheers for the other pointers, I&#8217;ll check them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Platypus</title>
		<link>http://www.zomo.co.uk/2005/11/highly-available-filesytems/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Platypus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.zomo.co.uk/?p=13#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Yes, ZFS has features galore, but it&#039;s not a cluster filesystem.  Sun has one, but I imagine being locked into Solaris would be even worse than being locked into Linux.  If being Linux-only is not a problem, you&#039;d probably also want to consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redhat.com/en_us/USA/home/solutions/gfs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GFS&lt;/a&gt; - originally by UMN and Sistina, since bought out by Red Hat.

If you&#039;re considering Coda, why not consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://openafs.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenAFS&lt;/a&gt; instead?  The main difference between AFS and Coda was disconnected operation, which would seem to be of little interest based on what you&#039;ve described.  OpenAFS is the lineal descendant of AFS, is supported on many platforms, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, ZFS has features galore, but it&#8217;s not a cluster filesystem.  Sun has one, but I imagine being locked into Solaris would be even worse than being locked into Linux.  If being Linux-only is not a problem, you&#8217;d probably also want to consider <a href="http://www.redhat.com/en_us/USA/home/solutions/gfs/" rel="nofollow">GFS</a> &#8211; originally by UMN and Sistina, since bought out by Red Hat.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re considering Coda, why not consider <a href="http://openafs.org/" rel="nofollow">OpenAFS</a> instead?  The main difference between AFS and Coda was disconnected operation, which would seem to be of little interest based on what you&#8217;ve described.  OpenAFS is the lineal descendant of AFS, is supported on many platforms, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
